Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Spanking / May 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

CPS critic OK to speak for herself,   not 'group':  PHOENIX Arizona —   A vocal critic of Child Protective Services   can continue speaking out at the Capitol  .

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fx - 31 May 2007 10:02 GMT
CPS critic OK to speak for herself, not 'group'
AG says it's that or registering as a lobbyist
By Daniel Scarpinato
arizona daily star
Tucson, Arizona | Published: 05.31.2007

http://www.azstarnet.com/allheadlines/185480

PHOENIX — A vocal critic of Child Protective Services can continue
speaking out at the Capitol.
But following a Tucson lawmaker's complaint, Robin Scoins must stop
speaking as the representative of her own one-woman organization to
avoid registering as a lobbyist.
As long as Scoins refrains from speaking on behalf of the Arizona Family
Rights Advocacy Institute, she will not face fines or a misdemeanor
conviction for previously representing the group without being a
registered lobbyist, according to the Attorney General's Office.
In a letter last week, Barbara Bailey, assistant attorney general, told
Scoins, "We have closed our file on this matter."
Scoins, a 39-year-old single mother of four in Peoria, has been under
scrutiny since March, when Tucson Rep. Pete Hershberger reported to the
Secretary of State's Office that Scoins was claiming to be appearing on
behalf of an organization but wasn't a registered lobbyist.
Scoins runs the organization out of her low-income housing unit and
maintains a Web site. According to the site, AZFRAI advocates for
parents "at risk of losing or have already lost custody of a child to
CPS … due to false allegations." Scoins also solicits donations.
Eventually the issue made it to the Attorney General's Office, which
concurred with Hershberger, chairman of the House Human Services Committee.
Scoins was told that she and her family-rights organization — which
consists only of herself — needed to register with the state if she was
to continue "lobbying" on CPS-related issues during Hershberger's
committee hearings. Scoins was also facing potential fines and a
misdemeanor conviction for lobbying without having registered.
Scoins, who disagrees her efforts constitute lobbying, decided rather
than register, she would drop the use of her organization when speaking,
a move that apparently appeased the state.
"I think it was kind of pointless to start this whole thing," Scoins
said Wednesday. "I was afraid if people were having to register (as
lobbyists) they weren't going to speak out. They already feel they can't
speak out as it is."
Scoins and Hershberger are not always in disagreement on bills. But
Hershberger tried to carve of moderate position on CPS during a time
when the organization is facing criticisms for its handling of cases in
Tucson and its level of openness and accountability.
The House Government Committee is leading its own closed-door
investigation into CPS, specifically looking into two cases in Tucson in
which children died despite CPS involvement.
Hershberger says he finds the attorney general's decision "appropriate."
"She's always had access," he said. "She can still make comments or she
can testify. She's done that. The problem comes in when she represents
someone or claims to represent someone and then doesn't register."

CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
Greegor - 31 May 2007 11:08 GMT
What's the big point about lobbyists being registered?
Isn't that more intended for lobbyists who are donating
big bucks to buy access to politicians?

Without the huge Big Money campaign contributions
isn't this a moot point?

That lady who works on the "support staff" at the
Arizona Foster Care Review Board (Cheri) was probably
not registered as a lobbyist there in AZ when she e-mailed
a legislator his traffic ticket report either!     ROFL!

Will Arizona reject the Child Protection INDUSTRY and their racket?

>   CPS critic OK to speak for herself, not 'group'
> AG says it's that or registering as a lobbyist
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
> TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
> ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
Dan Sullivan - 31 May 2007 12:45 GMT
> What's the big point about lobbyists being registered?

Is it not the law, Greg?

> Isn't that more intended for lobbyists who are donating
> big bucks to buy access to politicians?

Does the law exclude lobbyists who don't donate money from
registering, Greg?

> Without the huge Big Money campaign contributions
> isn't this a moot point?

Please explain in detail.

> That lady who works on the "support staff" at the
> Arizona Foster Care Review Board (Cheri) was probably
> not registered as a lobbyist there in AZ when she e-mailed
> a legislator his traffic ticket report either!     ROFL!

She emailed the legislator as a private citizen.

> Will Arizona reject the Child Protection INDUSTRY and their racket?

Which states have rejected the CP industry, Greg?

And if there are none please tell us which states are on the verge of
rejecting the CP industry and post your evidence.
Jason Ryels - 31 May 2007 13:40 GMT
>> What's the big point about lobbyists being registered?
>
[quoted text clipped - 24 lines]
> And if there are none please tell us which states are on the verge of
> rejecting the CP industry and post your evidence.

Hey Danno - did you find that uncircumcised boyfriend yet ?? lol.

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

firemonkey - 31 May 2007 16:02 GMT
Gee Kenny boy, thanks for your intelligent contributions.
Firemonkey

> >> What's the big point about lobbyists being registered?
>
[quoted text clipped - 31 lines]
>
> - Show quoted text -
Jason Ryels - 31 May 2007 17:33 GMT
> Gee Kenny boy, thanks for your intelligent contributions.
> Firemonkey

Are homo's usually top posting morons too??

Signature

Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

0:-] - 31 May 2007 19:58 GMT
>What's the big point about lobbyists being registered?
>Isn't that more intended for lobbyists who are donating
>big bucks to buy access to politicians?
>
>Without the huge Big Money campaign contributions
>isn't this a moot point?

Are you really asking for information, or giving the answers you wish
to believe the use of the insinuating question mark?

>That lady who works on the "support staff" at the
>Arizona Foster Care Review Board (Cheri) was probably
>not registered as a lobbyist there in AZ when she e-mailed
>a legislator his traffic ticket report either!     ROFL!

She wasn't lobbying for anything. She was, apparently, teaching him a
lesson.

I bet SHE knows about HIPAA and the fact it's impossible for CPS to
violate federal law to give the pompous pontificator (whoring for
votes,) access that violates HIPAA.

He KNOWS that if he got the info legitimately, by signing a
confidentiality agreement, that if HE revealed that information, HE
WOULD BE SUBJECT TO THE PENALTIES OF HIPAA.

I consider that unethical behavior on his part, to pretend that CPS
can violate HIPAA with impunity.

>Will Arizona reject the Child Protection INDUSTRY and their racket?

Will Greg stop speaking the tongues?

Your anti CPS and anti Government cronies, Greg, have been force
feeding you sh.t and you appear to be loving it.

But isn't it interesting that this is the same legislator that while
wanting openness is turning in a supporter for families engaged with
CPS.

He's seems as consistent as you.

>>   CPS critic OK to speak for herself, not 'group'
>> AG says it's that or registering as a lobbyist
[quoted text clipped - 95 lines]
>> TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
>> ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
0:-] - 31 May 2007 19:20 GMT
>  CPS critic OK to speak for herself, not 'group'
>AG says it's that or registering as a lobbyist
[quoted text clipped - 52 lines]
>DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
>SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

Man do you get things screwed up. The legislator is the one claiming
to be looking into CPS abuses and decrying their lack of openness, now
you report he's just turned in someone for being head of a support
group for CPS beleaguered parents.

Use a dictionary. Look up the word "consistency." Then for the
antonyms.

And there you have, fx, Greegor, and the various socks of krp.

R R R R R

>CPS Does not protect children...
>It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
[quoted text clipped - 38 lines]
>TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
>ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.