Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Spanking / June 2007



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

Ex-foster kids seeking millions from state:   A day before he died,   a 7-year-old boy reportedly tore through his basement window screen so he  could eat snow...

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
fx - 27 Jun 2007 08:56 GMT
DeLeon legal claims mount
Ex-foster kids seeking millions from state

Richard Roesler and Thomas Clouse
Staff writers
June 27, 2007

http://www.spokesmanreview.com/tools/story_pf.asp?ID=196824

OLYMPIA – As Carole Ann DeLeon sits in jail, charged with killing her
adopted son by depriving him of water, several of her foster children
are filing millions of dollars in claims against the state for failing
to protect them from physical or emotional abuse.

So far, claims totaling more than $55 million have been filed against
the Washington Department of Social and Health Services on behalf of
five children, including the estate of 7-year-old Tyler DeLeon, who died
in DeLeon's Deer Park-area home in 2005. State records show that school
officials, in particular, repeatedly reported concerns about the
bruised, emaciated boy.

"They were abused in a licensed foster home," said Cynthia Novotny, one
of the lawyers representing the children. "And despite 16 CPS (Child
Protective Services) referrals, CPS did nothing to protect these kids."

Tyler DeLeon's estate is represented by Breann Beggs of Spokane's Center
for Justice, a public interest law firm. He couldn't be reached for
comment Tuesday.

The criminal case against Carole DeLeon, meanwhile, seems set to go to
trial as scheduled July 16. Stevens County Prosecutor Tim Rasmussen said
Tuesday that plea negotiations with DeLeon have broken down. She has
pleaded innocent to homicide by abuse and to an additional charge of
second-degree criminal mistreatment of a second boy, identified in court
records by his initials: S.M.M.

Superior Court Judge Al Nielson has also approved busing in a jury from
Okanogan County to hear the high-profile case in the Colville courtroom.
Anticipating the need for a large jury pool, court officials plan to use
a hotel ballroom in Okanagon County, rather than a courtroom, to select
those jurors.

In Olympia, the children's claims have rolled in over the past year, the
most recent arriving this month. Most are for $10 million; one in
Tyler's name is for $15 million. The surviving children will likely need
lifelong counseling, Novotny said, and may be so traumatized that
they'll never be able to hold down a job. Plus, she said, the children
should be compensated "for having had to live in such a torturous
environment. The state should have been there to protect them, and wasn't."

A DSHS spokeswoman said the agency has made substantial changes in the
wake of the death but referred specific questions about the claims to
the attorney general's office, which didn't want to comment.

Novotny's law firm says it also intends to file claims against the
children's pediatricians and others who should have detected and
reported negligence or abuse.

"How many 7-year-olds weigh 28 pounds?" she said, referring to Tyler
DeLeon's weight when he died.

State records paint a bleak picture of life in the home, where Tyler was
one of six children in the care of DeLeon and her adult daughter,
Christina DeLeon-Burns. Of average weight when he was brought to the
home as an infant in 1998, the boy gained only 12 pounds in the ensuing
6 1/2 years. Carole DeLeon insisted that his teachers and caregivers not
give him food or water, to the point of watching him in the bathroom to
ensure that he didn't drink from a toilet. She claimed that the boy
could have a life-threatening reaction to overeating or drinking – a
diagnosis for which subsequent state investigations have found no
evidence. A day before he died, the boy reportedly tore through his
basement window screen so he could eat snow.

State records regarding Tyler show a litany of reported cuts, bruises, a
severely broken leg and two teeth "knocked out." DeLeon, state records
indicate, informed his Lake Spokane Elementary School teachers that they
should ignore such injuries because Tyler would injure himself and "make
up stories." School officials described the boy's daily lunch as half a
sandwich and "no more than 2 ounces of milk," – and that DeLeon would
require the boy to return home with a bite of sandwich and swallow of
milk remaining. She complained frequently about his "distended tummy,"
which she attributed to overeating.

The claimants include children ages 7, 9 and 11, as well as Amber Lynn
Daniels, who is now 18. (The law firm, Ressler and Tesh, says it also
represents a sixth child from the DeLeon home. The state's tort claims
office could not immediately locate a sixth claim Tuesday.)

According to court documents filed in Stevens County, Daniels lived at
the DeLeon home from 1998 to 2000. In that time, her weight plummeted
from 175 pounds to 102. She told investigators that DeLeon forced her to
go without water for long periods, and she once had to sneak a drink
from the dog bowl.

As punishment, Daniels told sheriff's Detective Jerry Taylor, DeLeon
made her carry hamburger in her mouth on an hours-long trip to a mall.

DeLeon's attorney, Carl Oreskovich, didn't return a call Tuesday seeking
comment on the allegations and claims.

State records also suggest that DeLeon was frustrated and overwhelmed by
misbehavior by Tyler. In a sobbing conversation with a caseworker in
December 2005, she said she never did anything injurious to any of her
children and that Tyler had been "a big eater."

The same files include numerous references to bruises on her children
and allegations that she hit some with a spatula. In Wyoming, where
DeLeon had been a foster mother in the 1980s before having her license
terminated, a 12-year-old girl said she was deprived of food, fed animal
feed as punishment, and had her hands tied behind her back for taking food.

State records include an allegation that the girl was tied up and left
in the basement overnight as punishment for eating three sticks of
string cheese. A 1988 CPS investigative record says a physician found
rope burns on the girl's wrists, belt marks on her buttocks, and bruises
on her face and thigh. An accompanying record says the girl was
"tormented, treated without regard to human dignity ... (and) belittled."

That girl, now an adult named Mary Shuhart Dees, is slated to testify at
DeLeon's trial.

Even if the state must pay tens of millions of dollars in damages to the
children, Novotny said, she's reluctant to say it will have a
substantial impact on how such cases are handled.

"The state keeps saying that they're going to change their policies
every time a child dies," she said. "It doesn't appear that happens."

DSHS spokeswoman Kathy Spears disagrees. More than 95 percent of
high-risk child-abuse complaints are now investigated within 24 hours
instead of the previous 10-day standard, she said. A better database of
past incidents is being developed. Staffers have access to an FBI
database for background checks. And the department is phasing in state
visits to foster children every 30 days.

If the state won't settle the cases, Novotny said, the children's claims
will likely be filed as lawsuits in Spokane in a couple of months.

CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A
DAILY BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL
SECURITY AGENCY/CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WIRETAPPING PROGRAM....

CPS Does not protect children...
It is sickening how many children are subject to abuse, neglect and even
killed at the hands of Child Protective Services.

every parent should read this .pdf from
connecticut dcf watch...

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com/8x11.pdf

http://www.connecticutdcfwatch.com

Number of Cases per 100,000 children in the US
These numbers come from The National Center on
Child Abuse and Neglect in Washington. (NCCAN)
Recent numbers have increased significantly for CPS

*Perpetrators of Maltreatment*

Physical Abuse CPS 160, Parents 59
Sexual Abuse CPS 112, Parents 13
Neglect CPS 410, Parents 241
Medical Neglect CPS 14 Parents 12
Fatalities CPS 6.4, Parents 1.5

Imagine that, 6.4 children die at the hands of the very agencies that
are supposed to protect them and only 1.5 at the hands of parents per
100,000 children. CPS perpetrates more abuse, neglect, and sexual abuse
and kills more children then parents in the United States. If the
citizens of this country hold CPS to the same standards that they hold
parents too. No judge should ever put another child in the hands of ANY
government agency because CPS nationwide is guilty of more harm and
death than any human being combined. CPS nationwide is guilty of more
human rights violations and deaths of children then the homes from which
they were removed. When are the judges going to wake up and see that
they are sending children to their death and a life of abuse when
children are removed from safe homes based on the mere opinion of a
bunch of social workers.

BE SURE TO FIND OUT WHERE YOUR CANDIDATES STANDS ON THE ISSUE OF
REFORMING OR ABOLISHING CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES ("MAKE YOUR CANDIDATES
TAKE A STAND ON THIS ISSUE.") THEN REMEMBER TO VOTE ACCORDINGLY IF THEY
ARE "FAMILY UNFRIENDLY" IN THE NEXT ELECTION...
Ron - 27 Jun 2007 22:32 GMT
> CURRENTLY CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES VIOLATES MORE CIVIL RIGHTS ON A DAILY
> BASIS THEN ALL OTHER AGENCIES COMBINED INCLUDING THE NATIONAL SECURITY
[quoted text clipped - 36 lines]
> their death and a life of abuse when children are removed from safe homes
> based on the mere opinion of a bunch of social workers.

Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post false
information with each of your posts?

Ron
Greegor - 27 Jun 2007 23:54 GMT
> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post false
> information with each of your posts?

Instead of doing this in various threads, why didn't you start a new
thread Ron?

The tag is NOT the subject of every thread.

HERE's a new thread just for your complaint Ron!

What exactly are you talking about?

Difference of opinion
Clash of political orientation
Conflict of interest

Hard data inaccuracies?
Ron - 28 Jun 2007 01:17 GMT
>> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
>> false
[quoted text clipped - 14 lines]
>
> Hard data inaccuracies?

Blatant lies!  Knowingly posting with each and every post false and
inaccurate data gregg.  If the tag is not the subject of the thread then
please ask fx why he includes it.  The data contained in his rather lengthy
tag line is false.  Proven false.  Yet he continues to peddle it as if it is
fact.

So gregg, take a stance here.  Its a lie.  You should be against that sort
of thing.  After all, you say that the entire case that CPS has on you and
your SO is based on lies, and you have made very clear what your opinion is
about that.  Shouldn't your reaction be the same for all lies gregg?  Or
just those that fit your own personal agenda?

Ron
Greegor - 28 Jun 2007 01:41 GMT
Ronn why can't you be more specific?

It looks like you are just a Foster Contractor in denial.

The burden of proof is on you, of course.

Convince me this is all about hard factual errors
and not a political difference of opinion.

> >> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
> >> false
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>
> Ron
Ron - 28 Jun 2007 04:22 GMT
> Ronn why can't you be more specific?
>
[quoted text clipped - 4 lines]
> Convince me this is all about hard factual errors
> and not a political difference of opinion.

Go look gregg.  I've posted the factual data, you have only to find it.  Its
not hidden, its very clearly posted in opposition to fx's falsehoods.  Put
those vast internet skills to work.

Ron

>> >> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
>> >> false
[quoted text clipped - 33 lines]
>>
>> Ron
0:-] - 28 Jun 2007 05:34 GMT
>Ronn why can't you be more specific?

Why did neither you, nor FX, respond when he WAS more specific?

Why wait this long to answer and THEN claim he was not specific?

You are a liar, that's why, Greg, and so is FX now and before.

>It looks like you are just a Foster Contractor in denial.

Of what? How do you "deny" lies, Greg?

YOU and FX are in denial when he and you refused to respond to Ron's
earlier posting of data that shot down fx's lies.

>The burden of proof is on you, of course.

The hell it is.

The burden of proof is on the person that first posts the data. fx did
that.

It's HIS burden to support his claim, or admit it is not accurate.

>Convince me this is all about hard factual errors
>and not a political difference of opinion.

Why? The truth is in the facts, not politics, or political
differences...unless of course, Ron is stating facts, and fx is
stating political opinion.

Facts beat politics every time, among honest people.

Check, and mate.

Next move, Greg, and fx.

0:]

>> >> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
>> >> false
[quoted text clipped - 28 lines]
>>
>> Ron
fx - 28 Jun 2007 01:42 GMT
>>> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
>>> false
[quoted text clipped - 27 lines]
>
> Ron

 No one has proven that the information In my tag line is false to "MY"
Satisfaction...  FX
Ron - 28 Jun 2007 04:25 GMT
>>>> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
>>>> false
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>  No one has proven that the information In my tag line is false to "MY"
> Satisfaction...  FX

Yeah.  Right.  If you refuse acknowledge the data provided then no one ever
can.

That's pretty cheap.  Its the same tactic that the holocaust deniers use to
support their claims.

Ron
0:-] - 28 Jun 2007 05:36 GMT
>>>> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post
>>>> false
[quoted text clipped - 30 lines]
>  No one has proven that the information In my tag line is false to "MY"
>Satisfaction...  FX

Then Greg is correct. You'll but political propaganda over facts.

YOu have NOT provided any support, other than ranting anti government
loonie declarations up for proof.

Let's see the facts.

Something that would be acceptable in a court of law.

Verifiable government collected data, to start.

Academic research peer reviewed for publishing, as the next best.

Something besides wild ranting, fx.

And no, mac, I was not the least interested in the posted bait. You
are monumentally stupid.

0:]
0:-] - 28 Jun 2007 04:59 GMT
>> Still waiting on an answer fx.  Why do you continue to knowingly post false
>> information with each of your posts?
>
>Instead of doing this in various threads, why didn't you start a new
>thread Ron?

He's challenging  the content of the post, dimwit.

>The tag is NOT the subject of every thread.

But it is IN every thread, hence he'd be avoiding the point if he
tried to leave the thread the author is IN, Greg.

>HERE's a new thread just for your complaint Ron!

Where?

>What exactly are you talking about?

He's explained that in prior posts to the individual.

Can't you keep up?

>Difference of opinion

Nope. Lies. Greg. Lies are not opinions, they are LIES.

Deliberate attempts to mislead readers.

>Clash of political orientation
>Conflict of interest

Nope. No such issues are being expressed when one deliberately lies.
It's just a lie.

>Hard data inaccuracies?

Where? Citations please.

What makes the author's data accurate, and other sources inaccurate,
Greg?

Fx is quoting knowing nut case anti government wackos.

So far as I know, Ron sticks to verifiable data collected by
government sources.

Do they lie?

Not as much as you pissants.

0:]
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.