16 year old?
|
|
Thread rating:  |
Keith - 08 Jan 2007 07:39 GMT I need some advice. My girlfriend and I have been together for 5 years now and she has a 16 year old son who is a freshman in high school. The problem is he is spoiled and I don't know what to do. He's allowed to stay up all night long,even on school nights. He has no responsibilities whatsoever, he is not required to clean his room, I recently counted 27 cans of mountain dew on his floor, some empty,some not. He doesn't have to mow the yard or do anything else around the house.He goes to school ,comes home and plays video games all night. Sometimes he comes home from school and goes to bed and gets up around 10 at night and then stays up all night. He will only eat pizza,hamburgers, or hot dogs, those are the only 3 items I have seen him eat in 5 years. He has never been made to try anything else. I borrowed his tv over the weekend (he was at his dads), we have a couple of tv in the shop. He came home and took his tv back, which was fine, but then he tells his mom he doesn't want me using it anymore and I'm not alowwed in his room. I payed for half the tv. If I try to correct him or make suggestions, I'm told I'm wrong. What should I do?
Kathleen - 08 Jan 2007 12:36 GMT How have you made it this long? Maybe you could just date?
With hope and heart, Kathleen -- He Himself is the fuel our spirits were designed to burn, or the food our spirits were designed to feed on. There is no other. ~ C.S.Lewis
> I need some advice. My girlfriend and I have been together for 5 years now > and she has a 16 year old son who is a freshman in high school. The [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =---- Vicki Robinson - 08 Jan 2007 12:59 GMT In a previous article, "Keith" <kg66@consolidated.net> said:
>I need some advice. My girlfriend and I have been together for 5 years now >and she has a 16 year old son who is a freshman in high school. The >problem is he is spoiled and I don't know what to do. [snip]
>I payed for half the tv. If I try to correct him or make >suggestions, I'm told I'm wrong. What should I do? First and least important, it doesn't matter who paid for the TV; if it was given to him and is regarded as belonging to him, it's his. He has the right to be selfish with it, although I agree that he's being ungracious and unnecessarily territorial, but that's 16-year-olds for you.
However, I'm interested in your statement "...I'm told I'm wrong." Who tells you that? The boy's mother? Because if it's the mom, you're boned, my friend. She's the parent, you absolutely must have her support if anything is to change. If she's satisfied with the way things are going, your suggestions are going to be like the adults in a Peanuts special: just a whaa-whaa sound from a muted trumpet. You can probably get her to agree to changes if you argue enough, but that doesn't mean she'll enforce changes or approach the problem with any enthusiasm.
I like Kathleen's idea. Move out, date your girlfriend but remove yourself from the daily annoyance of her son and once the boy is out of her house either at college or working, the two of you can decide what your next step is.
Good luck.
Vicki
 Signature "I'm just a bad Christian. A bad born-again Christian. And certainly, like the apostle Peter, I am capable of denying it, of presenting myself as a sort of leftist liberation-theology enthusiast and maybe sort of a vaguely Jesusy bon vivant. But it's not true" --Anne LaMott
S.D. - 08 Jan 2007 18:41 GMT > What should I do? I wish there was something really constructive to say, but considering your voluntary living situation, bad choices and weak value structure established five years back, you have very little ground to stand on; you can't even claim step-parent status!
You're essentially a weak roommate with the benefits of doing his mother; so it's not surprising you get no respect; you don't deserve any.
So, live with the household "you" created or get your girlfriend to go along with sending the boy to live with his father. If neither of those are possible, there's one last option, leave...
 Signature SD:)
-calliope- - 08 Jan 2007 19:56 GMT > So, live with the household "you" created or get your girlfriend to go > along with sending the boy to live with his father. *OMG*.... *HEAD.EXPLOSION*...
Gahhhhh..
> If neither of those > are possible, there's one last option, leave... > -- > SD:) he's the GD *boyfriend*.. his leaving should come before (wayyyyy before) the freakin' kid should be told to leave....
Lee - 08 Jan 2007 22:00 GMT >>So, live with the household "you" created or get your girlfriend to go >>along with sending the boy to live with his father. > > *OMG*.... *HEAD.EXPLOSION*... > > Gahhhhh.. C'mon, Cal, you *know* this character has been way out there with his 'advice' ever since he started posting. Try not to get the mean old troll get to you... ;-> Lee
S.D. - 08 Jan 2007 22:31 GMT
> *OMG*.... *HEAD.EXPLOSION*... Sounds good <g>
> he's the GD *boyfriend*.. his leaving should come before (wayyyyy > before) the freakin' kid should be told to leave.... Your observation is right!!!!! Except you left out one crucial part before you jumped down to a "head exploding" conclusion ----- I understand the BM and son relationship, and I got the "I'm told I'm wrong" part. But, the "BF posted" looking for options.
So, I gave him "what I felt" were options to his dilemma, and "leaving" would likely be his last choice, which is why it was placed last.
 Signature SD:)
-Calliope- - 09 Jan 2007 00:11 GMT > Your observation is right!!!!! Except you left out one crucial part > before you jumped down to a "head exploding" conclusion ----- I > understand the BM and son relationship, and I got the "I'm told I'm > wrong" part. But, the "BF posted" looking for options. And your advice to force a minor child to leave his home, because the boyfriend doesn't like how he's being raised is disgusting. But not all that surprising coming from you. Not at all.
> So, I gave him "what I felt" were options to his dilemma, and "leaving" > would likely be his last choice, which is why it was placed last. Requesting a parent to choose their lover over their child should not be on the table at all, it shouldn't be an "option" at all.....
IF this child were being violent or some such I could see trying to get him help, but the complaints here are that he simply doesn't like how the child's mother has raised him.. he needs to talk to his girlfriend and explain his feelings, certainly.. but in the end, she's the parent.. not the BF.
S.D. - 09 Jan 2007 18:50 GMT
> And your advice to force a minor child to leave his home, because the > boyfriend doesn't like how he's being raised is disgusting. But not all > that surprising coming from you. Not at all. I wish you would quit "personalizing" everything you disagree with. Makes mature exchanges of difference very difficult. <g>
My words: """ So, live with the household "you" created or get your girlfriend to go along with sending the boy to live with his father. If neither of those are possible, there's one last option, leave..."""
All from an OBJECTIVE "OPTION" perspective. Nobody here knows "exactly" what's going on in that household, OR his fathers household, or for that matter, what's emotionally happening with that boy. Even though not one NG regular has the perfect, end all, be all answer, outside of idealisms, you 'all really like to argue. Makes me wonder about motives.
Whether you agree in theory; sometimes a teenage boy is better off living with his BF. Either way, I wasn't suggesting the boy be thrown out on the street.
>but in the end, she's the parent.. not the BF. I couldn't agree more. As I said, given the living situation; he can't even claim the rights of being a step-parent!
> Requesting a parent to choose their lover over their child should not be > on the table at all, it shouldn't be an "option" at all..... You're right... in an ideal world. But, this isn't ideal - and, since they chose living together vs marrying - I have to believe, the flexibility of that chosen lifestyle is party the cause of "his" problems.
> IF this child were being violent or some such I could see trying to get > him help, but the complaints here are that he simply doesn't like how the > child's mother has raised him.. he needs to talk to his girlfriend and > explain his feelings, certainly.. I think he's already spoken with the BM about his frustrations with her son and her parenting style; and was told "his views are wrong." The reason he came here, trying to gain perspective.
>but in the end, she's the parent.. not the BF. Agree...
 Signature SD:)
Banty - 09 Jan 2007 19:56 GMT >> And your advice to force a minor child to leave his home, because the >> boyfriend doesn't like how he's being raised is disgusting. But not all >> that surprising coming from you. Not at all. > >I wish you would quit "personalizing" everything you disagree with. >Makes mature exchanges of difference very difficult. <g> At some point, folks make judgements about a contributor's judgement from his or her contributions. And, no, that's not the same thing as disagreement. If posts are consistent way out there or blindly one-sided, sooner or later you can expect folks to connect those posts with the individual who is contributing it.
Call it "personalizing" if you want. You can't expect each and every post of yours to be treated as if it came fresh and new from somewhere in the ether. And you can't expect every way of thinking to be treated the same. Some disagreements are more serious than others.
>My words: """ So, live with the household "you" created or get your >girlfriend to go along with sending the boy to live with his father. If [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] >idealisms, you 'all really like to argue. Makes me wonder about >motives. Motives for what?? What is yours? To whip all the non-room-cleaning pimply teens into shape? Or just to clear love-nests of these awful burdens?
Taking out a contract to 'off' the boy is also an "objective option". (OK, OK, this little matter of the law...) So would sending him off to a boarding school.
The POINT is that shuffling off a child to some other place, no matter that it's not "out on the street", simply to suit a new bedmate (marriage involved or not!), is NOT a decent option to consider. Not if they're five, not if they're fifteen. Even if dadddy is ready to take the kid in and is the Most Wonderful (if heretofore uninvolved or at least non-custodial?) Father in the World, there's a major rejection here that is way wrong and very damaging and can't be glossed over by your "hey I'm just coming up with options" stance on this.
Banty :) <-- smarmy smiley
heather m. - 09 Jan 2007 20:57 GMT >> And your advice to force a minor child to leave his home, because the >> boyfriend doesn't like how he's being raised is disgusting. But not all >> that surprising coming from you. Not at all. > > I wish you would quit "personalizing" everything you disagree with. Nobody here has done that here except for *you* getting huffy with Rebecca because you didn't like the way she worded something. However, you didn't mind doing the same thing to someone else, then crying that people take it personal just because you disagree. You are accusing others of being guilty of something you yourself have been guilty of doing.
I don't see anybody at all taking your disagreements personally. I see people disagreeing with them and *you* twisting it around and accusing them of taking it "personally" when they actually have a valid disagreement. Maybe you should accept that people will actually disagree with you from time to time and it won't be because they are taking it personal, it will be because your views have holes and flaws, like everyone's do from time to time. It is possible for your views to be flawed.
I'm beginning to think that you just like to cause trouble, and are a troll, but I guess we'll see.
Heather
> Makes mature exchanges of difference very difficult. <g> > [quoted text clipped - 38 lines] > > Agree... Robert from Michigan - 24 Feb 2007 05:25 GMT I some what agree with the posters here, with one issue..
the *bf* is an adult and the "child" should be taught to respect adults regardless of what the situation. If the mother is going to allow her son to walk all over her bf then he needs to rethink dating her.
By not teaching or reinforcing some sort of structure within the home she is disrespecting her bf as well as doing an Injustice to her son who will learn about the "real world' the hard way.
I have 3 children from my first marriage, my wife has None. I have full custody of my children and my wife and I discuss any and all discipline issues with each other. I learned that children will play one parent against the other and often will do it even more with a "step" parent.
So he needs to make a choice either he is IN the picture or he is not. From what he is saying about the mother he is NOT .. and needs to move on with his life and find someone else...
(I am sure this is just one item on a long list of issues that will come to haunt the relationship if it continues.)
If my kids disrespect my wife they will (and have) lose any and all liberties ..be grounded, what ever it takes to get them to learn to respect myself and my wife and any other adult in their life.
Children should respect their elders PERIOD!!
My ex-gf I was dating prior to my wife told her 2 yr old daughter to "get the F*** out of her face" I immediately told her we were done.. that alone told me enough about her character that I would no longer be able to continue dating her.
children need to learn responsibility and respect before they become adults, or they will have a very hard time in life as adults.
>> Your observation is right!!!!! Except you left out one crucial part >> before you jumped down to a "head exploding" conclusion ----- I [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > explain his feelings, certainly.. but in the end, she's the parent.. not > the BF. -Calliope- - 24 Feb 2007 13:55 GMT > I some what agree with the posters here, with one issue.. > > the *bf* is an adult and the "child" should be taught to respect > adults regardless of what the situation. If the mother is going to > allow her son to walk all over her bf then he needs to rethink dating > her. I don't see how this is disagreeing with what any of us said, though necessarily. The problem, if I recall the OP (this is a very old thread and I did not go back and re-read and I'm JUST waking up, lol..) is that the OP's solution was to send the kid to his dad's.. to me.. a kid is not someone you throw away, because you don't want him around. And if you're going to get involved with someone that has kids you have to know that it'll be hard work and you may not always agree with how that parent is raising their kids.
> By not teaching or reinforcing some sort of structure within the home > she is disrespecting her bf as well as doing an Injustice to her son > who will learn about the "real world' the hard way. I don't disagree.
> I have 3 children from my first marriage, my wife has None. I have > full custody of my children and my wife and I discuss any and all > discipline issues with each other. I learned that children will play > one parent against the other and often will do it even more with a > "step" parent. Yep.
> So he needs to make a choice either he is IN the picture or he is not. > From what he is saying about the mother he is NOT .. and needs to [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > > Children should respect their elders PERIOD!! eh.. I believe there are some very good exceptions. I didn't raise my children to be blindly obediant; IMO, doing so raises children who don't learn to think for themselves to do what is right and know what is wrong.
Blind obediance is how I ended up a molested child, for instance.
My children do not in any way, shape or form respect their father or his wife. But it is their father who killed their respect for him, as they did at one time. Nearly every single thing he has done in the last seven (!!!!) years has chipped away bit by bit any respect that he had.
His wife lost their respect very early in the game.. I think even before she sent them letters detailing what burdens they were.. (because she didn't like our custody arrangement, didn't like that his being with his kids meant she was not with just him, and *gasp* that he was financially obligated to support them!) They are, put simply, not people deserving of respect.
> My ex-gf I was dating prior to my wife told her 2 yr old daughter to > "get the F*** out of her face" I immediately told her we were done.. > that alone told me enough about her character that I would no longer > be able to continue dating her. I don't blame you... not sure how that relates to this situation though.
> children need to learn responsibility and respect before they become > adults, or they will have a very hard time in life as adults. They do, I agree with caveats. I don't think rejecting a kid and sending them away necessilarly teaches this however.
I don't think I've ever spoke here about how my mom and dad sent my older brother to live with our biological father when he was 16 y/o because he was a difficult child. This left lasting scars.. so much so that we saw him only three times in the next 22 years. (Thankfully, he's worked really hard to learn how to deal with that early rejection and came back to the family several years ago.. losing my brother this way was hard for *all* of us)
I agree that the OP, IIR his situation correctly, needs to discuss his concerns about their situation with the mom and try to work out a solution that works for the three of them, but if not, rather than getting her to send the kid away, needs to decide if he can live with the situation the way it is, or move on, himself.
Banty - 24 Feb 2007 16:28 GMT >> I some what agree with the posters here, with one issue.. >> [quoted text clipped - 83 lines] >send the kid away, needs to decide if he can live with the situation the >way it is, or move on, himself. Yep.
I don't really disagree with "Robert from Michigan" either, but I have a couple of red flags I see flying when I read his post. It's just so heavy-handed about this stuff.
First of all, in this thread and also the "bio mom probs" thread, I see this self-orientation that some step parents have about how someone else - a step child, even a bio child, an ex, respects *them*. This is that utterance or incident shows how much the that awful other person don't 'spect them :-/ Well, yes, people should treat each other with basic respect, including families, but inevitably people show their not-so-great sides to each other in any family. And all too often I've seen this "lack of respect" as a prelude to "my way or the highway". *Especially* with teens.
Well - life isn't always about oneself, and whether or not oneself is getting respected (and, dammit, I think a lot of this "but in the Real World they have to have learned respect" stuff is just self-justifiction for oneself thinking one needs all that 'spect!).
Again, of course peole need to respect either other, but a heavy-handed emphasis on this warns me that maybe there is either some desire for *power* really going on, or a rationalization for impending *rejection* that's going on. Not saying it's so, but saying the needle on my BS detector is starting to move...
So that's one red flag.
The other one is the one I've talked about so often - teens. Not too many teens will be saying "yes, sir", "no, ma'am", setting the table on time, and sitting on the couch with their hands folded, bringing in good grades and sports trophies, now are there! (Going to an extreme I admit for emphasis.) They *are* increasingly independant, they *are* still developing their thinking skills, and they *do* push back. Normal, good ones. And ones who have gone through all the upheavals that lead people to be posting in alt.support.step-parents about them - - even more so!!
And if that push-back and ordinary rebellion gets picked up by a parent (step OR bio) as an excuse to reject them, it's a damn tragedy, show of weakness and immaturity, and abandonment of obligation.
Banty
Caitriona Mac Fhiodhbhuidhe - 24 Feb 2007 20:36 GMT <snipped>
> The other one is the one I've talked about so often - teens. Not too many teens > will be saying "yes, sir", "no, ma'am", setting the table on time, and sitting [quoted text clipped - 8 lines] > bio) as an excuse to reject them, it's a damn tragedy, show of weakness and > immaturity, and abandonment of obligation. And there in a nutshell is part of the problem. Where do you draw the line? Where do you say, "I'll deal with this as best I can," and where do you say, "Enough!" and leave? Do you contribute yet another abandonment, or do you fight it out?
Kitten
Banty - 24 Feb 2007 21:56 GMT ><snipped> >>The other one is the one I've talked about so often - teens. Not too many teens [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > >Kitten Think- at what point of bad teenaged behavior do you think it acceptable for intact families to kick their teenaged child out or send him or her to a relative?
Now think - Why should step families have any different standard from intact families? I don't see anything. So, yes, the standard is rather high.
Banty
Vicki Robinson - 24 Feb 2007 22:26 GMT In a previous article, Banty <Banty_member@newsguy.com> said:
>>And there in a nutshell is part of the problem. Where do you draw the >>line? Where do you say, "I'll deal with this as best I can," and [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] >Now think - Why should step families have any different standard from intact >families? I don't see anything. So, yes, the standard is rather high. OK, but when is it time for the step-parent to bail? I think that's Kitten's point. Not kicking the kid out, but saying "Enough is enough; I'm not helping by allowing myself to be torn down" and leaving.
Vicki
 Signature "I'm just a bad Christian. A bad born-again Christian. And certainly, like the apostle Peter, I am capable of denying it, of presenting myself as a sort of leftist liberation-theology enthusiast and maybe sort of a vaguely Jesusy bon vivant. But it's not true" --Anne Lamott
Banty - 25 Feb 2007 03:13 GMT >In a previous article, Banty <Banty_member@newsguy.com> said: > [quoted text clipped - 13 lines] >point. Not kicking the kid out, but saying "Enough is enough; I'm not helping >by allowing myself to be torn down" and leaving. Depends on the step parent's committment to the marriage.
Look, there are accidents, illness, permanent life changes of all kinds. I'm amazed how somehow a difficult teen is such a life-changing debacle in some's view. Jees, unlike the debacles that people do deal with every day, the situation is not permanent.
Banty
Vicki Robinson - 25 Feb 2007 13:58 GMT In a previous article, Banty <Banty_member@newsguy.com> said:
>Look, there are accidents, illness, permanent life changes of all kinds. I'm >amazed how somehow a difficult teen is such a life-changing debacle in some's >view. Jees, unlike the debacles that people do deal with every day, the >situation is not permanent. You're right. I'm thinking more of a different case, one in which half the problem will still be there when the kids are gone.
Vicki
 Signature "I'm just a bad Christian. A bad born-again Christian. And certainly, like the apostle Peter, I am capable of denying it, of presenting myself as a sort of leftist liberation-theology enthusiast and maybe sort of a vaguely Jesusy bon vivant. But it's not true" --Anne Lamott
Banty - 25 Feb 2007 14:40 GMT >In a previous article, Banty <Banty_member@newsguy.com> said: > [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > >Vicki Yes that is a different case.
Banty
Robert from Michigan - 01 Apr 2007 18:19 GMT >> I some what agree with the posters here, with one issue.. >> [quoted text clipped - 44 lines] > > Blind obediance is how I ended up a molested child, for instance. Well I never said they should be "obedient" especially blindly. I simply said they need to learn to respect, there is a line there. children (over 4 or 5) know what is right and wrong for the most part. Whether they chose to follow what is right is an issue of itself. If the child is put in a position that is immoral, improper, illegal or otherwise WRONG they need to speak up and tell an adult they can trust. Ultimately its the parents responsibility. I happen to see parent actually teaching children disrespect by either doing nothing to correct it or teaching it by example toward the children or other adults in their life. If parents did their job and taught respect, and tollerance toward others that are different we would have a lot less violence in this world!
> My children do not in any way, shape or form respect their father or his > wife. But it is their father who killed their respect for him, as they [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > obligated to support them!) They are, put simply, not people deserving of > respect. I can only say one thing about someone like that, I would dump her and if doesnt then he has let that "evil" women get the best of him and his children, I would never be with someone that did not love my children and care for them in a manner that is fitting.. any sort of issues that I felt uncomfortable to leave my children with would leave me no choice but to tell her good bye. My children are mine by blood while my "wife" is by choice - I would say "she" is the burden in that situation NOT the children.
snip"she sent them letters detailing what burdens they were.." THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG!! children are NEVER a burden!! if they are thought of that way then maybe the parent should have given the child up at birth to another couple that tries to have children can not due to biologial reasons, but would not only give of their heart, time and love, but for most would give up almost anything to be a parent.
example I have a friend that lost 2 of her 4 children to "children and youth" or CPS its called in some states because she was unable to care for them. My wife and I are trying to get her to give us the youngest of the 2 she has not yet lost to the state - the mother is stating she can not handle both of them and her father had both of them till about 8 months ago (he had them for last 8 yrs) when he sent the oldest to live with her, he is now planning on bringing her the other child in the next few weeks. she has stated to me that she is not sure if she can handle both of them. I have offered to drive to her state 800 miles away to pick up the youngest (10 yr old daughter) and have her move in with my wife and I (I already have a bedroom with furniture set up for "just" her) I also have a large home with enough room. The girl knows me but not my wife and has stated she would like to move in with us.
I have to praise this woman even though she is thinking of giving up her daughter, (though they would still stay in constant contact as I would never take that away) she at least knows what her limits are and is willing to do what is best for her child.
What people do NOT seem to understand is that having children is a full time, as well as a life time commitment and that whether they stay with the other bio parent or not, they can not just simply "start over" and brush the children off or pretend they no longer exist. They need to put the children FIRST!! I know fathers that refuse to date after a divorce due to the fact that they fear how a "new" woman may treat his children or how the children may respond to someone else in his life. (I am not saying stay single forever - however we need to pay even MORE attention in picking a new mate when we have children and be upfront that the children will ALWAYS come first!)
When I met my 2nd wife I told her right up front that I was going thru a divorce, I had 3 children and I was not only talking to an attorney about getting custody but I was going to get custody PERIOD! I was up front that if she wanted to be with me that it was a package deal and I was not going to hide the fact that she would be helping me raise my children WITH me. I also asked my children how they felt about her. I will tell you this what my kids thought about her made a difference. If they simply did not like her because she was not "mom" I would have taken that as a concern, but not a strong one as children do NORMALLY have a bond to both natural parents, however if the children did not like her because of other issues that could be seen as real than I would have either slowed the relationship or stopped seeing her (which I did with 2 other women). I lucked out, not only did my kids fall in love with my 2nd wife, but she fell in love with the children. we included the children in our decision to get married.
people need to understand what a dysfunctional relationship is and do what they can to avoid it!!
>> My ex-gf I was dating prior to my wife told her 2 yr old daughter to >> "get the F*** out of her face" I immediately told her we were done.. [quoted text clipped - 22 lines] > send the kid away, needs to decide if he can live with the situation the > way it is, or move on, himself. -Calliope- - 01 Apr 2007 19:46 GMT > snip"she sent them letters detailing what burdens they were.." > THIS IS TOTALLY WRONG!! children are NEVER a burden!! if they are > thought of that way then maybe the parent should have given the child > up at birth to another couple that tries to have children can not due > to biologial reasons, but would not only give of their heart, time and > love, but for most would give up almost anything to be a parent. Err.. if he had given up his children for adoption, then I would have had to as well?... *I* certainly would never have gone with that.. and when they were born, he did not appear to feel so, either.
And I must say I find it totally weird to see a thread well over a month old pop up on my server! LOL
Banty - 09 Jan 2007 03:02 GMT >> So, live with the household "you" created or get your girlfriend to go >> along with sending the boy to live with his father. > >*OMG*.... *HEAD.EXPLOSION*... > >Gahhhhh.. Your and my brains are all scattered around the room together!
A sixteen year old is a bit lazy and watches TV. Suggested solution: jettison kid. Say WHAT??!?
>> If neither of those >> are possible, there's one last option, leave... [quoted text clipped - 3 lines] >he's the GD *boyfriend*.. his leaving should come before (wayyyyy >before) the freakin' kid should be told to leave.... Yeah jees.
Banty
heather m. - 09 Jan 2007 00:37 GMT >> What should I do? > [quoted text clipped - 6 lines] > mother; so it's not surprising you get no respect; you don't deserve > any. Hey I'd like to know why you feel this is appropriate yet you feel Rebecca was a smart a.s? You had a stinging reply here while her reply to you in another thread was of the same nature, arguably less stinging. She spoke the truth no less than you did.
Heather
> So, live with the household "you" created or get your girlfriend to go > along with sending the boy to live with his father. If neither of those > are possible, there's one last option, leave... S.D. - 09 Jan 2007 01:48 GMT > I'd like to know why you feel this is appropriate yet you feel Rebecca > was a smart a.s? because of how she finished her post... not its earlier content.
 Signature SD:)
heather m. - 09 Jan 2007 02:23 GMT >> I'd like to know why you feel this is appropriate yet you feel Rebecca >> was a smart a.s? > > because of how she finished her post... not its earlier content. You have a problem with the way she ended things in a blunt manner by saying this:
"Well, after 8 years of it, maybe you'd feel differently. Or maybe you'd just be admiring the size of your, um, principles, while your stepkid models your acrimonious and conflict-laden behavior."
But you don't mind being blunt in your manner by saying this:
"You're essentially a weak roommate with the benefits of doing his mother; so it's not surprising you get no respect; you don't deserve any."
She didn't do anything less than you did.
Heather
S.D. - 09 Jan 2007 17:24 GMT > But you don't mind being blunt in your manner by saying this: I said that to the OP; given the circumstances he put himself in, then contributed to, hoping to find an easy way to solve an difficult, likely unchangeable situation five years later.
 Signature SD:)
heather m. - 09 Jan 2007 18:28 GMT >> But you don't mind being blunt in your manner by saying this: > > I said that to the OP; given the circumstances he put himself in, then > contributed to, hoping to find an easy way to solve an difficult, likely > unchangeable situation five years later. And you were a total smart a.s about it. Pot. Kettle. Black.
Heather
Temily - 10 Jan 2007 05:50 GMT > I borrowed his tv over the weekend (he was at his dads), we have a couple of > tv in the shop. He came home and took his tv back, which was fine, but then > he tells his mom he doesn't want me using it anymore and I'm not alowwed in > his room. And fair enough too!
You say you "borrowed" his tv. In that case, why didn't you return it before he got back?
How would you feel if you went away for a weekend, he went into your room, and "borrowed" your tv and instead of him returning it, you had to 'take' the tv back?
I think it's always important to envisage yourself in the other person's place...then make your judgement.
Temily
rideswitch - 13 Jan 2007 21:30 GMT Hi Keith, this is a very interesting string. Would you mind reposting your original thread to http://onefamily.bornmannfamily.com/forum/Default.aspx
Our church just started this support group for blended families and I think this would be a great starter thread to the "Dating after Divorce" Forum.
Thank You and good luck.
Corey
Free Articles, Tools, Leases and Forms for Landlords www.FreeLandlordSoftware.com
New Blended Families Group, Articles & Message Board. http://OneFamily.BornmannFamily.com
> I need some advice. My girlfriend and I have been together for 5 years now > and she has a 16 year old son who is a freshman in high school. The [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > http://www.newsfeeds.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! 120,000+ Newsgroups > ----= East and West-Coast Server Farms - Total Privacy via Encryption =----
|
|
|