Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Parenting / July 2004



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

hitting children: what is legal?

Thread view: 
Enable EMail Alerts  Start New Thread
Thread rating: 
Rosie - 09 Jul 2004 09:40 GMT
Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing about
this with a friend.)

ROSIE
tHatDudeUK - 09 Jul 2004 10:42 GMT
> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing about
> this with a friend.)

It probably is at the moment, but hopefully won#t be when new laws come into
force and parent's who engage in such cruel behaviour will feel the long
hand of the law give them it back.
Chris French - 09 Jul 2004 12:22 GMT
>> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing
>about
>> this with a friend.)
>
>It probably is at the moment,

It certainly is at the moment, hitting children at the moment is covered
under a law dating back to about 1860, which says that parents can use
'reasonable chastisement' , and basically means you can do whatever you
want as long as you don't cause a significant injury.

Signature

Chris French

Lostin1999 - 09 Jul 2004 12:15 GMT
> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing about
> this with a friend.)
>
> ROSIE

Nothing is legal,  however there are (at present) no specific laws to
prevent smacking,  the use of any implement is assault with a weapon and
will be treated as use of a weapon able to create deadly force.. (IIRC those
are the correct terms)

HTH

Lost
Chris French - 09 Jul 2004 12:38 GMT
>> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing
>about
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>Nothing is legal,

Yes it is you are allowed to use 'reasonable chastisement' - dates back
to the 1860's though I can't remember the name of the bill.

Though since the ECHR ruling in 1998 the government agreed to change the
law on this

>however there are (at present) no specific laws to
>prevent smacking,  the use of any implement is assault with a weapon and
>will be treated as use of a weapon able to create deadly force.. (IIRC those
>are the correct terms)

Really? I know of no case where a parent has been convicted of assault
etc. for using a can or whatever, unless there has been a significant
injury - enough to cause ABH.
Signature

Chris French

Lostin1999 - 09 Jul 2004 13:51 GMT
> >> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing
> >about
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Though since the ECHR ruling in 1998 the government agreed to change the
> law on this

the term "reasonable Chastisement" is not actually what the parent feels is
reasonable, but what a jury of 12 of his peers think..

reasonable to who??  and under what circumstances is it legal to use a
weapon?  if it was just a hand across the buttocks this is (IMHO) ok,  but
to some its not...  but the use of a shoe, stick, cane, belt, metal dog
chain, copper pipe, baseball bat, railway sleeper... (ok taking the piss,
but you see what I mean.)

IMHO someone who has taken another's life (esp. a minor) has no rights,  but
they can't be beaten either...  so why should a child be beaten for a small
misdemeanour but a adult get less severe punishment for more sever crimes
(generalisation)

children do need discipline..  but always in a controlled manner..

the term "reasonable chastisement" does NOT allow the use of a cane or
stick..  it could be construed to allow one to merely tell a child off in a
louder than normal voice...

its ambiguous to try and claim a term like that actually allows beatings...

Lost
Welches - 09 Jul 2004 14:00 GMT
> >> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane?  (I was arguing
> >about
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> injury - enough to cause ABH.
> --
Locally when I was brought up a boy of 17 managed to get his step-dad for
assault for using a cane on him. Previously his step-dad had got the lad for
assault on him!!!
Debbie
A - 09 Jul 2004 16:46 GMT
> Though since the ECHR ruling in 1998 the government agreed to change
> the law on this

The last iteration/amendment of the Children Bill was on Monday in the
House of Lords and specifically dealt with this stuff. The (Hansard)
transcript is here:

 http://tinyurl.com/2j2v9

The subsequently amended bill is here:

 http://tinyurl.com/2s6rw

Section 49 ("Reasonable Punishment") is the relevant bit.

-A
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread
Enable EMail Alerts
Rate this Thread



©2010 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.