>> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane? (I was arguing
>about
[quoted text clipped - 3 lines]
>>
>Nothing is legal,
Yes it is you are allowed to use 'reasonable chastisement' - dates back
to the 1860's though I can't remember the name of the bill.
Though since the ECHR ruling in 1998 the government agreed to change the
law on this
>however there are (at present) no specific laws to
>prevent smacking, the use of any implement is assault with a weapon and
>will be treated as use of a weapon able to create deadly force.. (IIRC those
>are the correct terms)
Really? I know of no case where a parent has been convicted of assault
etc. for using a can or whatever, unless there has been a significant
injury - enough to cause ABH.

Signature
Chris French
Lostin1999 - 09 Jul 2004 13:51 GMT
> >> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane? (I was arguing
> >about
[quoted text clipped - 9 lines]
> Though since the ECHR ruling in 1998 the government agreed to change the
> law on this
the term "reasonable Chastisement" is not actually what the parent feels is
reasonable, but what a jury of 12 of his peers think..
reasonable to who?? and under what circumstances is it legal to use a
weapon? if it was just a hand across the buttocks this is (IMHO) ok, but
to some its not... but the use of a shoe, stick, cane, belt, metal dog
chain, copper pipe, baseball bat, railway sleeper... (ok taking the piss,
but you see what I mean.)
IMHO someone who has taken another's life (esp. a minor) has no rights, but
they can't be beaten either... so why should a child be beaten for a small
misdemeanour but a adult get less severe punishment for more sever crimes
(generalisation)
children do need discipline.. but always in a controlled manner..
the term "reasonable chastisement" does NOT allow the use of a cane or
stick.. it could be construed to allow one to merely tell a child off in a
louder than normal voice...
its ambiguous to try and claim a term like that actually allows beatings...
Lost
Welches - 09 Jul 2004 14:00 GMT
> >> Is it still legal to hit a child with a stick or cane? (I was arguing
> >about
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> injury - enough to cause ABH.
> --
Locally when I was brought up a boy of 17 managed to get his step-dad for
assault for using a cane on him. Previously his step-dad had got the lad for
assault on him!!!
Debbie
A - 09 Jul 2004 16:46 GMT
> Though since the ECHR ruling in 1998 the government agreed to change
> the law on this
The last iteration/amendment of the Children Bill was on Monday in the
House of Lords and specifically dealt with this stuff. The (Hansard)
transcript is here:
http://tinyurl.com/2j2v9
The subsequently amended bill is here:
http://tinyurl.com/2s6rw
Section 49 ("Reasonable Punishment") is the relevant bit.
-A