Re: meldon pretends he is hero of story but is really scoundrel

On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:

Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the
payor?
---------------------------
No, it would not.  It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off.

Most likely, the creation of such a large amount came in the form of fees,
penalties and interest to an otherwise sizable sum created by the court for
non-child support amounts.  Many times marital debt, insurance payments,
attorneys fees and other non-C$ sums are used to create such debt for the
purpose of punishing the defendant for getting uppity with the court for
such things as.. sticking to the truth; having verifiable factual evidence;
witnesses to verify their facts; able to rebut opposing counsel; exposing
lies presented as fact to the court; etc..

Most "Family Court" judges have an agenda and often times they know the
opposing attorneys very, very well.  If a plaintiff is Pro-se before the
court, such tactics are commonly used to keep the Pro-se litigate from
presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a
sham.  Most courts detest Pro-se litigates.

Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the
payor?

he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support
kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer