You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: meldon pretends he is hero of story but is really scoundrel
| Dusty | 04 Jul 2009 11:09 |
Dusty wrote:
> On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:
> > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support
[quoted text clipped - 21 lines]
> presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a
> sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates.
Abuse of the law does not mean the law is inherently unjust. It can be
just, insofar as it is presented with truth. In the eyes of the
unjust, truth is an enemy to be destroyed but this would destroy the
grail (and then the family) and then the law and then society.
I tell you now, you must trust what is sound and just and true and the
law is these things.
---------------------------
That's all well and good, but when the law is administrated by the corrupt,
then the law is corrupt as well.
|
| Meldon | 04 Jul 2009 07:39 |
> On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:
> > he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support
[quoted text clipped - 19 lines]
> presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a
> sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates.
Abuse of the law does not mean the law is inherently unjust. It can be
just, insofar as it is presented with truth. In the eyes of the
unjust, truth is an enemy to be destroyed but this would destroy the
grail (and then the family) and then the law and then society.
I tell you now, you must trust what is sound and just and true and the
law is these things.
|
| Dusty | 04 Jul 2009 07:09 |
On Jul 3, 11:59 pm, Anonymous <nob...@nymu.eu> wrote:
> he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support
> kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer
Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the
payor?
---------------------------
No, it would not. It just means that there is a sizable sum to pay off.
Most likely, the creation of such a large amount came in the form of fees,
penalties and interest to an otherwise sizable sum created by the court for
non-child support amounts. Many times marital debt, insurance payments,
attorneys fees and other non-C$ sums are used to create such debt for the
purpose of punishing the defendant for getting uppity with the court for
such things as.. sticking to the truth; having verifiable factual evidence;
witnesses to verify their facts; able to rebut opposing counsel; exposing
lies presented as fact to the court; etc..
Most "Family Court" judges have an agenda and often times they know the
opposing attorneys very, very well. If a plaintiff is Pro-se before the
court, such tactics are commonly used to keep the Pro-se litigate from
presenting his/her evidence and showing to the world that the court is a
sham. Most courts detest Pro-se litigates.
|
| Gloria Fong | 04 Jul 2009 04:03 |
> he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support
> kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer
Wouldn’t a larger amount of arrears suggest a greater offence to the
payor?
|
| Anonymous | 04 Jul 2009 03:59 |
he is deadbeat dad who owes over $300K in child support
kids don't have food but meldon's fridge has beer
|
Quick links:
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage