You are accessing this site in a read-only mode. For full access to all member benefits, including message posting, please login or register. Registration is completely free, simple, and takes only a few seconds.
Login |
Free FamilyKB.com registration |
Whole discussion thread
The message you are replying to and its parents are listed in the reverse order with the most recent posts first. This might not be the whole discussion thread. To read all the messages in this thread please click here.
Re: Loosen the Apron Strings - Alcohol
| phelbooth | 10 Jul 2009 22:03 |
On Jul 10, 4:03 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> (snip) > [quoted text clipped - 16 lines] > On the narrower question of "is there more drinking at middle school > age" I haven't seen any research. Just go to JStor and type in "alcohol use" and children and they'll pop up--I didn't write down any titles, etc. There were some interesting studies on parents' positions about alcohol in relation to under-age drinking, too, which more closely addresses the earlier parts of this thread.
|
| Doug Anderson | 10 Jul 2009 21:03 |
(snip)
> I did a quick search on Jstor, and both psychological and sociological > articles suggest there has been a change: in the lower age when kids > start drinking, in the overall % of under-18 who do drink, and in the > prevalance of binge drinking. I can't link you to the articles as > they're thru the U-server--there may be another in, but I don't know > it. Cool. Tell me the articles - I can find them from where I am.
I certainly have seen reports on increased prevalance of binge drinking, though these have always been journalistic and unencumbered by evidence.
I've also seen suggestions that, as Vickie writes, the average age at which girls start drinking has gone down.
On the narrower question of "is there more drinking at middle school age" I haven't seen any research.
|
| phelbooth | 10 Jul 2009 20:45 |
On Jul 10, 1:37 pm, Doug Anderson <ethelthelogremovet...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > >> > (snip) > [quoted text clipped - 80 lines] > Bill, and now you, have suggested it is higher than it used to be, but > no one is providing evidence for a change in any direction. I did a quick search on Jstor, and both psychological and sociological articles suggest there has been a change: in the lower age when kids start drinking, in the overall % of under-18 who do drink, and in the prevalance of binge drinking. I can't link you to the articles as they're thru the U-server--there may be another in, but I don't know it.
|
| Doug Anderson | 10 Jul 2009 18:37 |
> >> > (snip) > >> > [quoted text clipped - 25 lines] > Before it was the "bad girls", a small minority who partied and drank. > It is not a "bad girl" quality anymore. I understand that you are saying this. And I understand that you believe it to be true. But I really don't know that it is true.
Usually when we say "things are different" what we really mean is "the behavior we hear about now isn't how we behaved back then." But that can mean lots of different things.
It can mean that "we" (whoever we are) were unusual back then, and would be unusual now. It can mean that the behavior we hear about now is unusual now (only we don't hear that part) and it would have been unusual then.
Or it could even mean that things have actually changed. But for that I'd like to know who has measured that change and how.
> So when Suzy Somebody who is President Student Council and voted most > friendliest is drinking at sleepovers, the other girls follow suit. Perhaps, but this doesn't seem like a change. (Do middle schools really _have_ Student Council Presidents?)
> Girls are also very into impressing guys. Yes, quite likely. But also not seeming like a change.
> Perhaps before being > sloshed was not a quality boys looked for in girls. Lots of perhapses.
But as far as the answer to the question "Are there more middle schoolers drinking now than, say, 30 years ago," perhapses don't really do it for me.
> (Sort of thinking along the lines of "Splender in the Grass" here.) > But now if they look more "grown up" with a drink in their hand to be [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > I'm not sure what reasons could be given to conclude that alcohol > among the underage is lower than it used to be. Did anyone suggest it is lower than it used to be? I don't think so.
Bill, and now you, have suggested it is higher than it used to be, but no one is providing evidence for a change in any direction.
|
| Vickie | 10 Jul 2009 18:23 |
>> > (snip) >> > [quoted text clipped - 20 lines] > to answer that question, and no one else has offered anything that > addresses that question. In a word: girls. Girls are very clique oriented and into acceptance of their peers. Before it was the "bad girls", a small minority who partied and drank. It is not a "bad girl" quality anymore. So when Suzy Somebody who is President Student Council and voted most friendliest is drinking at sleepovers, the other girls follow suit. Girls are also very into impressing guys. Perhaps before being sloshed was not a quality boys looked for in girls. (Sort of thinking along the lines of "Splender in the Grass" here.) But now if they look more "grown up" with a drink in their hand to be most popular among the boys, they'll do it.
Also I think it may not be just more kids drinking now-a-days, but how much they consume. They are not just sneaking out a bottle of beer, haha heehee, but sitting round playing quarters with the bottles of the hard stuff.
Kids also, as Bill points out, have more time alone, which can cause problems. And with that, more money to spend on getting what they want.
I'm not sure what reasons could be given to conclude that alcohol among the underage is lower than it used to be.
Vickie
|
| Doug Anderson | 10 Jul 2009 17:47 |
> > (snip) > > [quoted text clipped - 14 lines] > I think it is fair to say that alcohol among middle schoolers (at > least) is comparitively higher then it used to be! Fair? I don't know about fair.
My question is: would it be _true_ to say that? I don't know enough to answer that question, and no one else has offered anything that addresses that question.
|
| Vickie | 10 Jul 2009 16:43 |
> (snip) > [quoted text clipped - 11 lines] > friends who were experimenting with alcohol. > 13 (and that was several decades ago). I think it is fair to say that alcohol among middle schoolers (at least) is comparitively higher then it used to be!
Vickie
|
| Doug Anderson | 09 Jul 2009 22:20 |
(snip)
> I wasn't talking about the legal drinking age. I was talking about the age > at which some children are beginning to drink alcohol *these days*. > Elementary age school age children drinking alcohol (or even becoming > alcoholics) was pretty much unheard of several decades ago. Elementary school aged children becoming alcoholics is pretty much unheard of now too.
And whether you ever heard of elementary school aged children drinking alcohol or not, several decades ago when I was 12 and 13, I had friends who were experimenting with alcohol. 13 (and that was several decades ago).
|
| Bill in Co | 09 Jul 2009 22:10 |
>>>>>>> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their >>>>>>> teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 79 lines] > > (I think the drinking age is dumb too.) I wasn't talking about the legal drinking age. I was talking about the age at which some children are beginning to drink alcohol *these days*. Elementary age school age children drinking alcohol (or even becoming alcoholics) was pretty much unheard of several decades ago.
>> Heck, even some elementary school age children are now into alcohol, or >> even alcoholics themselves! What does that tell you??? > > Nothing really. It does not tell me anything abut how this is worse than > it > used to be. Well, but you weren't around back then, and I was. (And please don't just say it wasn't "reported" back then, but it is now, and that's the only, or even the main, difference).
>> And THAT increasing prevalence HAS been a recent societal change. (ditto >> for the number of kids born to unwed and/or teenage moms). Viva La >> Progresso... > > All of what I have heard is that teen pregnancy is DOWN. Except in red > states, which just cracks me up. I'm not comparing to 10 years ago. I'm comparing it to 6 decades ago.
>>>> It's just yet another example of absentee parenting - done by "parents" >>>> who themselves are irresponsible. [quoted text clipped - 7 lines] > I think you can say these parents have the wrong idea. But it is their > caring that has them thinking they are helping their children. You call that "caring"?? That's not caring, that's avoiding responsibility. It's not just "they have the wrong idea".
>> IOW, they are a bit "out to lunch" in the parenting dept. Like giving in >> to their child's demands because it's just "too much work" not to, or, >> they are just too clueless to even understand the ramifications - OR both >> of the above. |
| Stephanie | 09 Jul 2009 19:33 |
>>>>>> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their >>>>>> teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 67 lines] > > It's much more common today. On what do you base that assertion?
> And the "drinking age" has fallen. When did it fall and from what to what? Anywhere I look it has risen to 21. Here in VT when I was a kid, the age was 18. Now it is 21.
(I think the drinking age is dumb too.)
> Heck, even some elementary school age children are now into alcohol, or > even alcoholics themselves! What does that tell you??? Nothing really. It does not tell me anything abut how this is worse than it used to be.
> And THAT increasing prevalence HAS been a recent societal change. (ditto > for the number of kids born to unwed and/or teenage moms). Viva La > Progresso... All of what I have heard is that teen pregnancy is DOWN. Except in red staes, which just cracks me up.
>>> It's just yet another example of absentee parenting - done by "parents" >>> who themselves are irresponsible. [quoted text clipped - 5 lines] > "Absentee parenting" means "there is no one home", in the broader sense - > NOT literally. I think you can say these parents have the wrong idea. But it is their caring that has them thinking they are helping their children.
> IOW, they are a bit "out to lunch" in the parenting dept. Like giving in > to their child's demands because it's just "too much work" not to, or, > they are just too clueless to even understand the ramifications - OR both > of the above. |
| Bill in Co | 09 Jul 2009 19:29 |
>>>>> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their >>>>> teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 59 lines] > Except it really isn't since it was prevalent when I was a teenager as > well. It's much more common today. And the "drinking age" has fallen. Heck, even some elementary school age children are now into alcohol, or even alcoholics themselves! What does that tell you??? And THAT increasing prevalence HAS been a recent societal change. (ditto for the number of kids born to unwed and/or teenage moms). Viva La Progresso...
>> It's just yet another example of absentee parenting - done by "parents" >> who themselves are irresponsible. > > How are they being absent? I think the idea is meritless. But the one > thing > you can't accuse the parents of being, in thiss case, is absent. "Absentee parenting" means "there is no one home", in the broader sense - NOT literally. IOW, they are a bit "out to lunch" in the parenting dept. Like giving in to their child's demands because it's just "too much work" not to, or, they are just too clueless to even understand the ramifications - OR both of the above.
|
| Stephanie | 09 Jul 2009 18:42 |
>>>> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their >>>> teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 54 lines] > > "Bizarre" is an understatement. But it's just a sign of the times. Except it really isn't since it was prevalent when I was a teenaer as well.
> It's just yet another example of absentee parenting - done by "parents" > who themselves are irresponsible. How are they being absent? I think the idea is meritless. But the one thing you can't accuse the parents of being, in thiss case, is absent.
|
| Bill in Co | 09 Jul 2009 17:22 |
>>> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their >>> teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 51 lines] > > Me too. "Bizarre" is an understatement. But it's just a sign of the times. It's just yet another example of absentee parenting - done by "parents" who themselves are irresponsible.
|
| Stephanie | 09 Jul 2009 13:35 |
>> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their >> teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 41 lines] > So to me sponsoring a party fo 16 year olds where it is _generally_ > expected that these kids will be drinking sounds very strange. I think it is completely nuts. But it was happening even back when I was a kid. All that happened was that whatever sanity we had around alcohol was completely abandoned in favor of relying on the grown ups to keep us from dying.
> The idea that there is a _junior_ high graduation party where drinking > is being tolerated by adults seems simply bizarre to me. Me too.
|
| Doug Anderson | 01 Jul 2009 00:50 |
> Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their > teenagers. [quoted text clipped - 34 lines] > > What to do????? I'm surprised. I know people (including myself and my wife) who will occasionally let our teenagers have a very small glass of wine with us at dinner. I would never do this for someone _else's_ teenager.
So to me sponsoring a party fo 16 year olds where it is _generally_ expected that these kids will be drinking sounds very strange.
The idea that there is a _junior_ high graduation party where drinking is being tolerated by adults seems simply bizarre to me.
|
| SamIAm | 30 Jun 2009 19:04 |
Thought I would ask how others handle the Alcohol issue with their teenagers.
We (my wife and I) drink socially, but not much at all. Maybe once a month or so, if people are over. We have allowed our 16 year old to have a couple of drinks at special occasions (New Years Eve, etc.). Our thoughts are that she will probably drink at some point and we would just as well she experience it first with our supervision. Myself personally and my wife, both starting drinking alcohol at age 16. We drank a lot more when we were younger. My wife stays away from it, because her father drank way too much.
Our first experience was when our oldest was in Grade 10 and barely 16. One of her hockey teammates (her coaches daughter) was turning 17 and her parents were having a party for her. The party was in their house and the parents would be chaperoning. The parents made sure we were aware that there would be alcohol at the party. In our jurisdiction it is illegal to drink until age 18. But apparently this happens quite a bit.
Our first instinct was to say she couldn't go. Then that she could go, but wasn't allowed to drink. We ended up buying her two 'coolers' and let her go to the party. We dropped her off and picked her up. I guess we have set the precedent that our kids can drink once they are in Grade 10. Thankfully, this daughter isn't all that social and hasn't asked to do anything like this since.
We recently had a fight with our second daughter who is 14 and in Grade 9. They have a small graduation ceremony (from Junior High) and our daughter wanted to be able to go to a party where drinking would be happening. Supposedly, everyone was going to be there. We held our ground and told her it wasn't allowed until she was in Grade 10 and even then only when supervised.
This daughter is very social and I have no doubt she will be asking to go to parties all the time in grade ten (a couple of months away).
What to do?????
|
Quick links:
|
|
|