Home | Contact Us | FAQ | Search & Site Map | Link to Us
Sign In | Join | Other 45 Sites in Network
Home
Discussion Groups
Parenting
ParentingMothersSingle ParentsStep ParentsAdoptionTwinsSpankingChildren's Health
Pregnancy
PregnancyBreastfeeding
Marriage
MarriageDivorce
FamilyKB.com
Contact UsLink To UsSearch & Site Map

Family Forum / Parenting / Spanking / April 2006



Tip: Looking for answers? Try searching our database.

ThreadLast Post  Replies
Spanking parents need not debate17 Apr 2006 20:01 GMT18
The folks shouting at each other here using the best of their logic...
I bet no one is changing their minds.
What is true is that spanking parents know something non-spanks can not
understand. What for all of history has made a family where the adults
Another reason why the no-spank flagship is sinking17 Apr 2006 15:59 GMT3
>From the educational goobers that brought you the paddle-free classroom
comes more exciting news.  The village idiots have been running off
good teachers before they even get into the classroom.  Worse, this was
going on prior to the "educational flatline"!
What makes no-spank so unstable?17 Apr 2006 01:30 GMT61
A latter day Much Ado About Nothing might adequately describe the
situation.  Only, this play would be a tragedy and all the scheming
would result in ruination of the very thing they proposed to save.
Another appropriate title might be Don't Mess with Mother Nature.  This
Nutrition and Violence17 Apr 2006 01:03 GMT1
I found this quite interesting.  It's preliminary research of course,
but it gives a new perspective on why poverty and violence might
be connected.
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/magazine/16wwln_idealab.html
What would you do if.....16 Apr 2006 21:28 GMT71
.....you had an older family member that was developmentally
disabled...say with Down's Syndrom, with the mental capacity of a 10
year old?
If they were cranky, even defiant, would you put them across your knee
How do you know when conservatives are lying?16 Apr 2006 15:37 GMT9
When they say, "It's about the children." How do you know when LIBERALS
are lying? When they say, "It's about the children."  Nether side cares
much about children.  Children exist as little more than an EXCUSE to
perpetuate their pet agenda.  Child pornography is an excuse for
Have you seen this child?16 Apr 2006 07:53 GMT2
This could be you asking this question!
We have found a link to a Computer Monitoring
Software company that offers a product that can
track what your is doing online.
That Other Study16 Apr 2006 07:04 GMT15
While no-spanks have endlessly debated obscure and largely irrelevant
self-serving no-spank research, the Foundation for Child Development's
Child Well-Being Index reveals an "educational flatline" has existed
for the past 30 years!  Despite glib promises of future improvement in
The law is not all powerful14 Apr 2006 22:32 GMT2
     It doesn't take a genius to know that the law is not all
powerful. Policemen are not invincible, theyre mortals who can be
stopped just like anybody else. During the black liberation movement,
there was a case of these two police officers where each of them was
True perverts revealed11 Apr 2006 22:26 GMT4
Not a single no-spank stepped forward to condemn the mostly white and
all female roll call of shame!  Sex with students is OK in the radical
feminist mind.  It's paddling that's evil.   Small wonder education
flatlined decades ago.  The feminist-inspired equality agenda was more
Pick and Pack11 Apr 2006 17:28 GMT1
Looks like the screeching dancing hysterical monkey boy is back with the
usual tactics.
ignore the more important parts of a comment or issue and find something
that could be construed as a "mistake" in a less important or non
The only debate that counts10 Apr 2006 04:17 GMT6
The only debate that counts is whether no-spanks can consistently raise
better children than everyone else.  That's it.  Everything else is
little more than a carnival sideshow.
Teachers do get assaulted07 Apr 2006 19:42 GMT10
    Somebody would have to be living in a vacuum to think that
teachers never get assaulted by students in highschool. We all hear
stories about that kind of stuff in the news or read about it in the
papers, or we might even know somebody who has direct experience with
If these had been men, then what?07 Apr 2006 05:21 GMT13
The following website lists 12 teachers accused of sexual indiscretions
with students.  Most of the offenders are educated, and presumably
LIE-bray-all white females from diverse areas of the country.
http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0404062teacher1.html
Why 2 to 12?04 Apr 2006 19:19 GMT17
Why did the Canadians say it was OK to spank kids from ages 2 to 12?
Because those are the nominal ages between which boys and girls can be
treated EXACTLY alike!  The no-spank & maybe-spank game is all about
equality. That's why the Canadian Supreme Court had to violate
Pages: 1 2 3 March, 2006
 
Sign In
Join
My Latest Posts
My Monitored Threads
My Blog
My Photo Gallery
My Profile
My Homepage

Start New Thread



©2009 Advenet LLC   Privacy Policy - Terms of Use
This website includes both content owned or controlled by Advenet as well as content owned or controlled by third parties.