| Thread | Last Post | Replies |
|
| Spanking parents need not debate | 17 Apr 2006 20:01 GMT | 18 |
The folks shouting at each other here using the best of their logic... I bet no one is changing their minds. What is true is that spanking parents know something non-spanks can not understand. What for all of history has made a family where the adults
|
| Another reason why the no-spank flagship is sinking | 17 Apr 2006 15:59 GMT | 3 |
>From the educational goobers that brought you the paddle-free classroom comes more exciting news. The village idiots have been running off good teachers before they even get into the classroom. Worse, this was going on prior to the "educational flatline"!
|
| What makes no-spank so unstable? | 17 Apr 2006 01:30 GMT | 61 |
A latter day Much Ado About Nothing might adequately describe the situation. Only, this play would be a tragedy and all the scheming would result in ruination of the very thing they proposed to save. Another appropriate title might be Don't Mess with Mother Nature. This
|
| Nutrition and Violence | 17 Apr 2006 01:03 GMT | 1 |
I found this quite interesting. It's preliminary research of course, but it gives a new perspective on why poverty and violence might be connected. http://www.nytimes.com/2006/04/16/magazine/16wwln_idealab.html
|
| What would you do if..... | 16 Apr 2006 21:28 GMT | 71 |
.....you had an older family member that was developmentally disabled...say with Down's Syndrom, with the mental capacity of a 10 year old? If they were cranky, even defiant, would you put them across your knee
|
| How do you know when conservatives are lying? | 16 Apr 2006 15:37 GMT | 9 |
When they say, "It's about the children." How do you know when LIBERALS are lying? When they say, "It's about the children." Nether side cares much about children. Children exist as little more than an EXCUSE to perpetuate their pet agenda. Child pornography is an excuse for
|
| Have you seen this child? | 16 Apr 2006 07:53 GMT | 2 |
This could be you asking this question! We have found a link to a Computer Monitoring Software company that offers a product that can track what your is doing online.
|
| That Other Study | 16 Apr 2006 07:04 GMT | 15 |
While no-spanks have endlessly debated obscure and largely irrelevant self-serving no-spank research, the Foundation for Child Development's Child Well-Being Index reveals an "educational flatline" has existed for the past 30 years! Despite glib promises of future improvement in
|
| The law is not all powerful | 14 Apr 2006 22:32 GMT | 2 |
It doesn't take a genius to know that the law is not all powerful. Policemen are not invincible, theyre mortals who can be stopped just like anybody else. During the black liberation movement, there was a case of these two police officers where each of them was
|
| True perverts revealed | 11 Apr 2006 22:26 GMT | 4 |
Not a single no-spank stepped forward to condemn the mostly white and all female roll call of shame! Sex with students is OK in the radical feminist mind. It's paddling that's evil. Small wonder education flatlined decades ago. The feminist-inspired equality agenda was more
|
| Pick and Pack | 11 Apr 2006 17:28 GMT | 1 |
Looks like the screeching dancing hysterical monkey boy is back with the usual tactics. ignore the more important parts of a comment or issue and find something that could be construed as a "mistake" in a less important or non
|
| The only debate that counts | 10 Apr 2006 04:17 GMT | 6 |
The only debate that counts is whether no-spanks can consistently raise better children than everyone else. That's it. Everything else is little more than a carnival sideshow.
|
| Teachers do get assaulted | 07 Apr 2006 19:42 GMT | 10 |
Somebody would have to be living in a vacuum to think that teachers never get assaulted by students in highschool. We all hear stories about that kind of stuff in the news or read about it in the papers, or we might even know somebody who has direct experience with
|
| If these had been men, then what? | 07 Apr 2006 05:21 GMT | 13 |
The following website lists 12 teachers accused of sexual indiscretions with students. Most of the offenders are educated, and presumably LIE-bray-all white females from diverse areas of the country. http://www.thesmokinggun.com/archive/0404062teacher1.html
|
| Why 2 to 12? | 04 Apr 2006 19:19 GMT | 17 |
Why did the Canadians say it was OK to spank kids from ages 2 to 12? Because those are the nominal ages between which boys and girls can be treated EXACTLY alike! The no-spank & maybe-spank game is all about equality. That's why the Canadian Supreme Court had to violate
|